Tuesday, July 04, 2023

Four for the Fourth 2023: Going Forth Towards Justice

If you're a regular follower of this blog, you should notice by now I'm kind of chomping at the bit for the American legal system to pick up the pace and hold donald mf'ing trump accountable for all the crimes he's (allegedly) committed (at least the ones since 2015).

The current situation is that trump is facing:

This is all the criminal charges trump is facing. There's STILL the civil trial in New York set for this October led by the state attorney's office - which is dropping hints (WHY?!) they may delay their case so it won't interfere with the criminal ones - and another civil trial by E. Jean Carroll against trump based on when trump was in the presidency, which was separate from the already-resolved trial against the defamatory stuff trump said after he left office.

Part of me had been hoping that Smith was going to release the additional indictments on trump before the holiday, but I now realize he probably held off on it so that most Americans can enjoy the day off and not get distracted by the partisan noise that will certainly erupt the moment trump facing more criminal charges, especially the insurrection matter that should be resolved soon with any hope.

I admit, as I've said before, I am obsessed on this matter because it irks me at a personal level that a con artist and failed businessman like trump never answered for his behavior in any serious way. The bankruptcies and settled lawsuits that dot his landscape were evasions of that, and it all built up as trump lied and bluffed and stole his way into an office of power he never should have held.  From there, he committed serious crimes that threaten our national security, and so much of that is unforgiveable to me, and ought to be to all other Americans on this day of national celebration.

So that's me, waiting for all the good news to drop this month now that the 4th of July is closing up at sunset with light shows and fireworks (which we shouldn't use because it upsets our animals) and music and... Holy Shit is that Carlton hosting PBS's A Capitol Fourth?!

Happy 4th of July! And let justice be done!


Hark! A Review of Bruce Springsteen Albums

As appropriate for a Fourth of July "Four For the 4th" blogging effort, here's my look back at all of the Bruce Springsteen studio albums of the past 50 (!) years. Took me months to write this...


As I've mentioned earlier, I attended a Bruce Springsteen concert last February. As a long-time fan since the early 1980s - honestly before Born In the USA blew up - going to a show was one of those things you gotta do in life. Springsteen is legendary as a live artist, with marathon shows, crowd-sharing antics, emotional intensity that can overwhelm an arena (or even stadiums). Alas, over the years I 1) did not have the budget for it and 2) missed at the few times he toured when I could afford it due to work or calendar conflicts. This time around - facing the reality that Bruce is in his 70s and the odds of him touring will diminish - I planned feverishly to try and get tickets for his 2023 tour that just happened to start in my backyard of Tampa FL.

Goddamn Ticketmaster screwed me up when I tried to get the tickets though. I had to get bailed out by my brother Phil - also a big fan - who was able to scoop up the scalped tickets a month before the show. You do see him and my sister-in-law Karen in some of the photos I blogged gushing over the show.

Having done that, I felt I was overdue in going through the vast discography of Bruce - dating all the way back to 1972! - and so here I am, taking note of how THE BOSS rose from the mean streets of Freehold New Jersey to world domination in a career spanning more than 50 years.

Springsteen began like most rockers playing as a garage band, working his way up to gigs around the towns with fellow teenagers. Joining up with bands calling themselves the Castiles, and then later another group Steel Mill, Springsteen formed his own band and got the attention of Columbia Records around 1972. Coming in with the "Jersey Bar" sound mixed with expectations of being a folk-acoustic performer akin to Bob Dylan, Springsteen's early work impressed critics but didn't sell a lot of records. It would take the word-of-mouth regarding his live shows - overwhelming, epic nightly performances compared to religious experiences - to form his fanbase as his career improved into the late 1970s, especially as his third album "Born To Run" proved to be his home run hit.

Never as great a poet as Dylan, Springsteen's true strength proved to be storytelling, especially in the live shows where he would intermix tales of him growing up in both a turbulent era - Vietnam especially haunts him and his circle of friends - and a turbulent home with the songs that came from those experiences. 

In 1984, the unexpectedly huge response to Born In The USA catapulted him to uber-celebrity status to where "The Boss" became the cornerstone of classic American rock-n-roll. While Springsteen's fame ebbed during the 1990s, he maintained a schedule of new releases (and re-issues of older material to explore his outtakes and musical pathways) to keep himself at the top of the game.

It would take forever for me to rank all these studio albums - although some are clearly my favorites and several are "What the hell were you thinking, Bruce?" - so a chronological retrospective is more in order. There is much like the Beatles an evolution to Springsteen's musical history, shifting from mood to mood and band line-up to solo works. In some respects, Springsteen chronicles the ebb and flow of American history - the angst he felt as part of the Vietnam generation, witnessing the fall of union labor and rise of economic turmoil in his New Jersey communities, the horrors of 9/11, and the insights of growing up and growing old - from the turbulent 1960s onward.

Title: Greetings from Ashbury Park NJ (1973)

Importance: As his debut album, Springsteen was expected to make his impact on the early 1970s music scene, which at the time was dominated by blues or acoustic folk acts filling the void left by the Beatles breaking up. The company wanted a full acoustic album of just Bruce on guitar, but Bruce included his band on most recordings, and there got to be a fight over it. The album ended up being a mix of both, with Springsteen writing and mixing with limited help "Spirit In the Night" and "Blinded By the Light" to appease a studio exec who felt there were no singles in the original playlist.

The critics loved it, but for myself the album is (still, years later) too raw. Where some bands jump out with a hot first album, this one sounds and feels like a rookie effort from someone who hadn't figured it out yet. Lyrics - trying hard to tell stories instead of setting mood - didn't always keep to the rhythm of the songs. Lacking the confidence, poise, or emotional maturity that would show up later. Even the later live performances of these songs are improvements to these early efforts.

It doesn't hurt to listen to "Greetings" to get an idea where Springsteen started from, but don't expect to get blown away by this. (And Manfred Mann did a better version of "Blinded By the Light")

Epic Song(s): None
Great Song(s): Growin Up, Spirit In the Night, It's Hard To Be a Saint In the City
Good Song(s): Does This Bus Stop at 82nd Street, For You


Title: The Wild, The Innocent, and the E Street Shuffle (1973)

Importance: This is where following Bruce as he evolved from album to album helps. You can hear the improvement in melody and meshing the rhythm to the lyrics compared to "Greetings."

No longer expected to be an acoustic solo act, Springsteen was able to bring in a full band now going by the E Street moniker, especially saxophonist Clarence Clemons, organist Danny Federici, and bassist Garry Tallent (all major members of the band for much of its history). Along with drummer Vini Lopez and pianist David Sancious, they filled out the blues (with a bit of funk rolled in) band lineup that would make the Jersey Bar sound work for Springsteen's style. With this sound Springsteen's confidence grew, especially as he took this on tour where the E Street performances wowed audiences coast to coast. The song "Rosalita" while not a big single release became Springsteen's signature song on stage.

If I encourage anyone to listen to Springsteen, I would tell them to start with THIS album first.

Epic Song(s): Rosalita (Come Out Tonight)
Great Song(s): The E Street Shuffle, 4th of July Ashbury Park (Sandy), Kitty's Back, Incident on 57th Street
Good Song(s): none (New York City Serenade is too freaking long, and Wild Billy's Circus Story too weird)


Title: Born to Run (1975)

Importance: By this point, due to low sales of the first two albums, Bruce was facing a make-or-break. The critics loved him, the live crowds adored him, but the record-buying markets did not. Willing to shift to a new sound, aiming for the Phil Spector "Wall of Sound" style to make his music more radio-friendly, Springsteen worked on lyrics more profound and on music more operatic (even as he cut back on the playtime of most songs to fit within the 5-minute clock that radio stations prefer songs fit into). He brought in new help - music critic Jon Landau who became a fan of Bruce during his big tour ("I have seen the future...") - and filled out the E Street Band with old friends (Steven Van Zandt especially) he could trust.

The end result was a more packed, coherent album that played like a self-contained rock opera (although the songs themselves did not relate to each other). Although he attempted to downplay the New Jersey narratives that reflected his first two albums, this one still spoke - especially "Born to Run" and "Jungleland" - to the experiences of growing up in (and growing out of) the Garden State.

Born To Run turned out to be not just Bruce's breakout hit, it proved to be one of the greatest albums of all time. His romantic lyrics finally reached a confidence that matched the best poetry out there (without having to delve into the symbolism that Dylan would). I had "Thunder Road" taught to me in a college class by a professor who was wowed by Bruce's word choice and narrative skill. Most of the songs are radio staples to this day, and several - including the band's autobiographical song "Tenth Avenue Freeze Out" - are concert favorites well into 2023 (I can vouch for that). 

If there's anything jarring in my mind it's "Meeting Across the River," a spoken-word tale in the style of 1940s crooners (think Frank Sinatra) that works better as a short story than a lyric. But it still foreshadows a lot of the darkness and desperation that would appear in Springsteen's later works (hint Nebraska hint).

There are no serious misses on this album. This is why I compared it earlier to epic albums like Joshua Tree, Nevermind, and Revolver (or Rubber Soul, or Abbey Road, or...)

Epic Song(s): Thunder Road, Tenth Avenue Freeze Out, Born to Run, She's the One, Jungleland
Great Song(s): Night, Backstreets
Good Song(s): Meeting Across the River


Title: Darkness on the Edge of Town (1978)

Importance: After the epic high of Born To Run came this mood twister of an album. Reflecting Springsteen's sour mood after a prolonged legal battle with his previous album producer, and reflecting the national mood as the 1970s saw economic decline across the blue-collar places that Springsteen felt connections to, Bruce and his bandmates crafted enough songs during this period to fill at least four albums' worth of music (which would show up later in re-release albums dedicated to the outtakes like The Promise).

Eschewing the "Wall of Sound" production style, this album goes with a more punk mentality even as the orchestral band sound powers through. The lyrics take on darker themes (hence the album title and main song anchoring the whole thing) to where Bruce is questioning just what America really means.

For myself, I put this album ahead of Born To Run in terms of artistic and lyrical quality. When I had a poetry collection assignment for a creative writing class in high school, this was the album I listened to and inspired me to write each poem for that assignment (I got a good grade, might have been an A). My mom saved the typed pages, I hope I've still got them in storage somewhere...

Epic Song(s): Badlands, Candy's Room, The Promised Land, Prove It All Night, Darkness on the Edge of Town
Great Song(s): Something In the Night, Streets of Fire
Good Song(s): Racing In the Streets


Title: The River (1980)

Importance: Every artist seems to want a double-album release somewhere in their career, so Bruce decided at this point to drop this massive opus on America just as the national mood shifted from the miasma of 1970s to the (false) sunlight of a Reagan dystopia. Either that or Bruce's experience of weeding down from his previous album Darkness (some of those outtakes survived onto this album) convinced him he might as well release most of what he and the E Street Band did just to get it out there (there WAS an early version of this called The Ties That Bind as a single album, but Bruce rejected that and recorded even more songs to make The River).

Where Bruce claimed Born To Run was an album based on the American experience, this album truly was: Running on themes of families drifting away, hopes dashed, relationships failing, and a sense that everything the Boomer generation grew up to disappearing into scrapbooks and faded memories. There were frivolous rockers like "Out In the Street," "Cadillac Ranch," and "I'm A Rocker" on here, but dominating this album were cynical, heartfelt songs like "Hungry Heart" and "Point Blank" and other, slower tunes that echoed the melancholy of Darkness.

Like most double-albums, fans can argue about what songs shouldn't have been included to reduce the album to a more manageable single release. For myself, the final quarter of this - on vinyl, it'd have been Side Four, on CD it's the second half of Disc Two - were slow, painful listens and I haven't been a fan of those songs. However, I am a huge fan of "Point Blank" which has a similar slow and mournful style but yet carried more powerful lyrics and emotional heft as Bruce performs it. I woke up one morning to "Point Blank" playing on the radio, and I lay in bed listening to it and I swear it played for like 12 minutes and I felt every second of it.

Bit of trivia: Bruce wrote the song "Hungry Heart" for the punk band Ramones, but Landau talked him into keeping it for himself. It turned into Springsteen's first Top Ten hit song. What would the music world be like if the Ramones had gotten that song and it took them to the Top Ten?

Epic Song(s): Hungry Heart, Out In the Street, Point Blank
Great Song(s): The Ties That Bind, Two Hearts, You Can Look (But Better Not Touch), Cadillac Ranch, I'm a Rocker
Good Song(s): Sherry Darling, The River, Fade Away


Title: Nebraska (1982)

Importance: All of the darkness and cynicism creeping into Springsteen's early work reaches an epic apex with this album, arguably a solo work with sparse inclusions of other E Street band members. "Sparse" is a good word for this album, as it tears down the American Dream and shakes loose a lot of the nightmares haunting the nation as crime and despair followed the collapse of blue-collar communities Bruce called home.

The recording history for this album took on legendary status: Springsteen recorded a bunch of new songs onto a single recorder, planning to have the E Street re-do them into more rounded rock-n-roll numbers similar to Darkness and River. Thing was, when they did record the "electric" version of most of those songs, Bruce realized the original solo takes were the better versions and decided to release a cleaned-up set of songs from that. Several of the songs recorded from this period would end up as full E Street songs on Born In the USA, meaning there are at least nine known unreleased songs as well as the full-band versions of several of these songs in the vault that fans would love to hear some day. 

I should note Bruce and the E Streeters perform a hard-rock version of "Johnny 99" which they did at the 2023 Tampa show, but compared to the original sparse version, I gotta go with the sparse. An up-tempo song about a guy wanting to be on death row just isn't a toe-tapper. Otherwise, drummer Max Weinberg is on record claiming the "Electric Nebraska" kills it (yes, pun intended).

"Killing It" is the most common theme across this album, as most songs deal with a major character committing murder and the emotional fallout haunting them to each song's end. Even "Atlantic City" opens with one of the most iconic lines in music "Well they blew up the Chicken Man In Philly last night/And they blew up his house too..." which gives mafioso Phil Testa one of the most memetic deaths outside of Goodfellas.

In terms of repeat listens, this is a hard album to start and finish. Ever see the film Requiem For a Dream? This is similar: You can listen to it once and appreciate the artistic talent that went into it, but it's not exactly something you play at pool parties and family reunions. The only up-tempo song on here is "Open All Night" and it's a personal favorite of mine (this one song also helped with that poetry assignment I mentioned earlier) but past that it's all moody stuff similar to "Point Blank". Some of these songs - especially "Atlantic City," "Johnny 99," and "Highway Patrolman" - are vital parts of the Springsteen oeuvre, so this is still a must-hear album.

Epic Song(s): Atlantic City, Johnny 99, Highway Patrolman, Open All Night
Great Song(s): State Trooper, Reason To Believe
Good Song(s): Mansion On the Hill


Title: Born In the USA (1984)

Importance: Where Born to Run was a major seller and arguably a magnum opus, Born In the USA was a major blockbuster... and arguably Springsteen's most misunderstood and overhyped album ever.

Coming at a time when the music industry got into popular music - with a set rhythm and polished production (oft-times overproduced) that balanced between funk/dance and arena rock-n-roll - as well as rushing into videos as marketing with the stateside explosion of MTV, BitU became the focus of a mass media campaign playing up to the themes of Americana that Springsteen had been working with the past few albums. Intentionally recorded as a rocking album to counter the starkness of Nebraska, the power of the E Street Band's musical style attracted audiences attuned to the beats and the swagger, which ironically distracted from the rather negative dark lyrics Springsteen used to highlight his ongoing concerns about the decline of the blue-collar middle class. As a result, the album gained a notoriety for appealing to more conservative audiences who failed to pay attention to the lyrics that were railing against them.

The perfect example is the title song itself "Born in the USA," written from the viewpoint of a struggling Vietnam vet unable to find work, unable to cope with the friends he lost in the war, and doomed to live in the "shadow of the penitentiary" implying he was now a career criminal. Problem is, Bruce's passionate screaming of the chorus part "I WAS... BOORRRRRNNNN IN THE USAAAA!" made listeners think it was a song about rah-rah Patriotism. President Reagan himself tried to incorporate the song for his 1984 re-election campaigns. Springsteen came to openly regret he ever made the song into a rock-n-roll hit.

A lot of Boss fans believe this image
is symbolic of Bruce taking a piss - look at how he's standing -
on the American flag, a direct rebuke of the
rah-rah patriotism that Bruce saw during Vietnam
and the Reagan years.

Controversy aside, this album is one of Bruce's major works, an effective mix of moody ballads, odes to nostalgia, and straight up rockers. If you ignore the hype and actually listen to the lyrics, that is.

Epic Song(s): Born In the USA, Downbound Train, No Surrender, Glory Days
Great Song(s): Darlington County, I'm On Fire, Bobby Jean, My Hometown
Good Song(s): I'm Going Down, Dancing In the Dark


Title: Tunnel of Love (1987)

Importance: Coming off of the media high of the Born In the USA period, and also coping with the complexity of his own personal life going through the wringer, this album defied the expectations the media had of Bruce sticking to the manufactured flag-waving that had made him an 80s superstar.

Having wed an actress/model Julianne Phillips in 1985 - almost under societal pressure to do so - that marriage quickly soured, which reflected on this album's entire theme of the highs and lows of relationships.

Technically not an E Street album, as the band members only appeared in several songs throughout, but also not a straight solo album like Nebraska, this work seems to take a middle approach. Even with the backing band helping the music be more radio-friendly, this becomes arguably Springsteen's most personal album speaking from his own soul about the turmoil he needed to resolve.

In my opinion, this may be Springsteen's greatest work. The lyrics are at the level of sheer poetry, the music matching the mood on nearly every song, and the entire album fitting its themes about love and loss in ways few other albums by other artists ever achieved (Fleetwood Mac's Rumours arguably the only work to exceed this one). "Brilliant Disguise," an incredible gut-wrencher of a song about the pain of falling out with someone you thought you knew, is in my humble opinion the greatest song Bruce ever wrote.  

Epic Song(s): Tougher Than The Rest, Spare Parts, Tunnel of Love, Brilliant Disguise
Great Song(s): Ain't Got You, All That Heaven Will Allow, Two Faces, One Step Up, Valentine's Day
Good Song(s): Cautious Man, When You're Alone


Title: Human Touch (1992) 

Importance: With the 1980s in the rearview mirror, Springsteen made the decision to reinvent himself as a different kind of rocker. He made the announcement that he would perform with a brand-new backing band (he didn't exactly say outright that the E Street Band was finished, but yeah) and set to work on two albums to be released simultaneously (there was a brief fad by artists like Guns n Roses to release two separate single LPs instead of releasing a double album, as though giving fans a choice to buy one or the other).

The resultant releases - at least here with Human Touch, not as much with Lucky Town - was a more pop-oriented sound than even Born in the USA. It was as though Bruce decided "Okay, let's make an album for an arena rock tour." However...

Both these albums had the misfortune of coming out just as Nirvana and the Grunge movement reset the rock music scene in the opposite direction Bruce was heading. The pop mentality underscoring Bruce's work on this album failed to appeal to general audiences, and worse alienated die-hard Springsteen fans more attuned to a rawer, bar-band sound. Some of the songs on this album have held up over the years, such as the title track, "Roll of the Dice," and "Real World," but others like "57 Channels" - Bruce's hoped-for pop hit that preached in all the wrong ways - were painful mistakes. The other album release at least walked away with a slightly better reputation.

Epic Song(s): Human Touch, Roll of the Dice
Great Song(s): Gloria's Way, Real World
Good Song(s): Soul Driver, All Or Nothing At All


Title: Lucky Town (1992)

Importance: Released in sync with Human Touch, Lucky Town had the impression of being the more blues-oriented sound of the two. Where Human Touch focused on more pop-flavored tunes, this album appealed to the sounds Springsteen relied on in his earlier albums. Problems again were that the over-produced feel to the songs hurt some of the tunes that could have been better off with more rawness. Still, of the two, Lucky Town is more enjoyable work all these years later. Like the debates fans have about double albums over what could get pared down to a more pleasing single album, I would argue Bruce was better off taking the best songs here and the best songs on Human Touch and just releasing that as one (better) album.

Epic Song(s): Better Days, Big Muddy
Great Song(s): Lucky Town, Living Proof
Good Song(s): Local Hero, If I Should Fall Behind, My Beautiful Reward


Title: The Ghost of Tom Joad (1995)

Importance: Either reeling from the backlash of the previous albums' poor reception, or else getting into the groove of bouncing between band-backed studio albums followed by toned-down acoustic solo works, this album had Springsteen returning to his meditations on the decline of the American middle class and the cynicism of a political culture that punishes the poor.

Essentially the spiritual successor to Nebraska, but done with a more somber and slow take and with more country influence than folk, one of the problems with this album was how bleak it got compared to everything else Springsteen had done before. Not helping matters was a dip in the sound quality: Half of everything Bruce sang was whispered or muffled, making this a nearly incomprehensible work. Coming at a time when my other music faves U2 and Van Halen were releasing miscues of their own, this was an album I just couldn't get into and kind of soured me on music for the rest of the 1990s.

Re-listening to it now for this review, I can be more forgiving now than how I first received this album, but it's still more bleak than what I like to hear. Makes me wonder what an "electric" version of this album would sound like.

Epic Song(s): Ghost of Tom Joad
Great Song(s): Straight Time
Good Song(s): Youngstown, The New Timer, Galveston Bay, My Best Was Never Good Enough


Title: The Rising (2002)

Importance: The release date matters. THIS was the album Bruce released in the wake of 9/11. 

Responding to the emotional trauma of the entire nation, Springsteen crafted songs and odes to those who had fallen that day and for the families they had left behind. Echoing the beliefs he's shown about American life throughout his early period - much like Darkness but without the bitterness - this was Bruce's - and the reunited E Street Band's - return to form.

Anchored by the title track "The Rising," which was less an anthem - not at all like "Born in the USA" - but more a hymnal, a religious memorial to those who died on 9/11. The closing chorus of Bruce describing the images of family and loved ones while another voice echoes "A Dream of Life" is the most haunting thing I've ever heard, and automatically triggers a crying fit even thinking about those lines. Excuse me (wipes the tears away). It's a song you need to sing (not listen, you will feel yourself driven to sing along) in cathedrals, and when performed live - trust me, I witnessed it first hand this February - it's a straight-up religious experience.

This wasn't an album written in anger. It was an attempt at coming to terms with the grief.

Epic Song(s): Lonesome Day, The Rising 
Great Song(s): Waiting on a Sunny Day, Further On Up the Road
Good Song(s): Counting on a Miracle, My City In Ruins


Title: Devils & Dust (2005) 

Importance: Following the pattern of an acoustic album after a band album, Springsteen culled together songs he'd been working on for a decade or more and issued this to critical acclaim. On this, he played more to the style of Dylan instead of Pete Seeger (which had been more noticeable influences on Nebraska and Tom Joad), which gives some of the songs more of a rock n roll edge than before. It's still in the purview of Darker and Edgier that makes this album hard to sit through in a good mood.

Epic Song(s): Devils & Dust, Long Time Comin
Great Song(s): All the Way Home, Maria's Bed
Good Song(s): Jesus Was an Only Son, The Hitter


Title: Magic (2007)

Importance: Getting back into the groove of reuniting with the E Street Band (AGAIN), Springsteen also got back into the habit of writing about the struggles of Middle America, this time with a bittersweet nostalgia as Bruce is clearly going through middle age. Both the quagmire of the Iraqi/Afghani wars - which had to trigger Bruce's memories of what Vietnam did to his friends - and the early onset of the Great Recession added to the underlying despair.

Among the darker elements of this album were several of Springsteen's brighter musical efforts, with "Girls In Their Summer Clothes" mirroring the romantic early works like "Rosalita", except with the melancholy of an older man wondering why those girls "passed me by." It was a song that deserved a little more radio love at the time, and it's arguably one of his later works that equals the best albums from his peak. 

The way I don't see much talk about this album, I get the feeling this was a very underrated effort and people need to reconsider its place in the Springsteen pantheon.

Epic Song(s): You'll Be Coming Down, Gypsy Biker, Girls In Their Summer Clothes
Great Song(s): Radio Nowhere, Livin' in the Future, Long Walk Home
Good Song(s): Last to Die, Terry's Song


Title: Working On a Dream (2009)

Importance: What Steven Van Zandt called the last of a trilogy of albums - starting with The Rising and seconded by Magic - covering the mood Springsteen had regarding the decade scarred by 9/11, bad wars, economic malaise, and questionable Star Wars prequels. Going in hard with a big rock-n-roll sound with the E Street backing him up, Springsteen attempted to create a grand musical experience on this work, only to have a lot of miscues and questionable decisions muck things up. This was the first album post-Born to Run I didn't fully like, and a recent re-listening for this review still didn't win me over. 

This was also the album that band member Dan Federici recorded on before passing in 2008. This is the point where time is catching up to the band, and the future albums were going to reflect that.

Epic Song(s): Lucky Day
Great Song(s): Working on a Dream, the Wrestler
Good Song(s): alas


Title: Wrecking Ball (2012)

Importance: Building up on the anger about the causes of the Great Recession that was still ongoing by this point, witnessing the passage of time affecting his New Jersey roots as well as coming to terms with more personal loss, this was the album Springsteen released to a new decade coping with the same old sorrows.

Not a full E Street effort but more rocking than his acoustic albums, this album shares more with Tunnel of Love in that regard, but it more closely resembles Magic in mood and effort. Anchored by the title track "Wrecking Ball" - an ode to the demolition of aging Meadowlands Stadium, where Springsteen played often on his tours - this is an album defined by defiance.

This is the album released after the death of "Big Man" Clarence Clemons himself (the album is dedicated to him). His power on the saxophone, a key element to the brass Jersey Bar sound that carries the band even after his passing, this was a loss that affected Bruce and the band in painful ways. 

Epic Song(s): Wrecking Ball
Great Song(s): Shackled and Drawn, Land of Hope and Dreams, We Are Alive
Good Song(s): Easy Money, You've Got It


Title: High Hopes (2014)

Importance: As part of the ongoing efforts by Springsteen to re-record, remix, and update many of the songs he's worked on since the 1970s - his backlog of unreleased material could fill a five-story library, and I might not even be exaggerating - Bruce often came out with releases like Tracks and The Promise to cover particular eras or productions like the Darkness sessions. This album was probably the first by my estimation where he added remixes of already-released songs performed in alternative ways as though rethinking his earlier decisions and looking for better acceptance.

As such, this is one of Bruce's more experimental albums, not artistic like Nebraska but exploring the range and feel of his existing music to see if he could find something fresh out of his older works. To my ears, not a lot of the songs worked out the way he hoped, but some of the choices - like turning "Ghost of Tom Joad" into a rock-n-roll number that would fit well into Magic and Wrecking Ball playlists - turned out as effective re-imagined efforts.

Epic Song(s): Just Like Fire Would 
Great Song(s): High Hopes, American Skin (41 Shots), Ghost of Tom Joad
Good Song(s): The Wall


Title: Western Stars (2019)

Importance: I tell no lie, I'm not a fan of country music. Southern rock, oft-times yes. And there are times in Springsteen's oeuvre where he crosses from Jersey Bar sound to Southern sound without missing a beat and going back again like he was merely visiting. When he goes acoustic most of his work echoes the folkways style of Seeger and Dylan, but some of those songs do carry a western flavor. This was the album where Bruce well full cowboy.

To be fair, Springsteen kept wanting to record albums that reflected the full American experience (like writing the Great American Novel) and so there had to be a lot of western-themed songs bouncing around in that head of his. Inspired by the California rock sounds of the 1970s like Glen Campbell and the Eagles - which carried a lot of country influence - Springsteen brought to it his own sense of nostalgia and bittersweet view of an America he missed from his youth.

For me, I dreaded getting this album worried it was going to be a sound I wasn't going to comprehend - much like watching U2 go disco on me with Pop - but this turned out to be a listenable effort, with decent songs that didn't sound any different from songs I've heard between Darkness through Wrecking Ball. At least Bruce got this out of his system. I think.

Epic Song(s): Sundown, Hello Sunshine
Great Song(s): Tuscon Train, Sleepy Joe's Cafe
Good Song(s): Hitch Hikin' 


Title: Letter to You (2020)

Importance: Coming relatively quickly after Western Stars, as though Springsteen wanted to get back to his rock roots with the E Street Band as soon as possible, Letter to You came out just as the world shut down over a pandemic. It seems almost fitting, as a lot of the songs on this album seem affected by all the personal losses Bruce was feeling echoing the similar losses a lot of people were going through (not just the deaths of loved ones, but the reality our lives were changing in ways that can't be undone).

A lot of the lyrics on this album come across as Bruce's most personal work since Tunnel of Love, and is near-equal to that album in terms of poetic impact. Songs like "Last Man Standing" - dedicated to Bruce's friend George Theiss who co-founded his first band the Castiles - covered themes like aging, and regret of a man reaching 70 and coming to terms that he's closer to his death - "coming for me like a freight train" - than to his birth.

Musically this is one of Springsteen's most melodic efforts, and arguably the best album he's done since the 1980s, placing this atop the great albums - Born to Run, Darkness, and Tunnel of Love - on his resume.

Epic Song(s): Letter to You, Last Man Standing, House of a Thousand Guitars, Ghosts 
Great Song(s): Burnin' Train, I'll See You In My Dreams
Good Song(s): Rainmaker 


Title: Working On a Dream (2022)

Importance: Interesting for a musician/songwriter like Springsteen, he's got so much of his own material to record you don't expect him to do a lot of covers of songs written/performed by others (Hell, he's given half the music industry his outtakes between 1977 through 1987). So it was a shock to witness Bruce release an album of nothing but covers. This is, by his own account, an attempt to "just sing" and perform the songs he felt did justice to the "great American songbook."

Focusing on R&B and soul songs from the 1960s through the 1980s, Bruce does his best to sing in that style, and on some of these songs he acquits himself well. It's just... well, I'm sorry, not every song deserved a cover version (the originals being way better no matter what Bruce tries to do). To me, the most egregious is his take on "Nightshift," a memorial song originally sung by the Commodores dedicated to Jackie Wilson and Marvin Gaye: where the Commodores was soulful as befitting an R&B group, Springsteen's attempt just sounded... wrong, overproduced, not at the right tempo. More of a rocker than an elegy. Bruce may love that song, but... I'm sorry, it was perfect the way it was.

This album does help us as a fanbase to see what influences Bruce when it comes to his own work. And some of the performances are good. It's just... was this trip really necessary?

Epic Song(s): Don't Play That Song
Great Song(s): Do I Love You (Yes I Do), Turn Back the Hands of Time, Any Other Way
Good Song(s): Soul Days, I Wish It Would Rain 


And that, kiddos, is the official studio albums he's done. Wanna go into some of the albums and packaged releases of importance to the Springsteen catalog? 'Cause there's MORE (oh Gods).

Maybe for the next tour. 

Four for the Fourth 2023: Second Thoughts About DeSantis' Flailing

So the Governor of Florida Ron DeSantis is running around, campaigning - rather badly at it - for the 2024 Republican nomination for the presidency, and his biggest message is "let's make America like Florida" selling his argument that he's turned the Sunshine State into a bastion of FREEDOM against "woke" librulism.

The thing is, DeSantis hasn't really done anything for freedom in Florida. He's supporting book bans and whitewashing of racism from our history books. He's cutting back on social services that could free rural families from poverty. DeSantis even went out of his way to use the line-item veto power to slash at budget items to punish fellow Republicans who refused to back him in his presidential campaign, not a very liberating thing to do.

But it's been two big political items that DeSantis committed that are coming back to hammer him. Above all, his harsh stance on immigration that drove him to push for and sign legislation attacking migrant workers and their employers. Digby has the current dirt on that:

It’s a super great idea to crack down on immigrant labor during a time of full employment and a building boom in a big agriculture state. So smart. And that’s what Ron DeSantis has done so that he can pretend he’s a tough hombre in a border state (which he isn’t.)

I should mention that's a sarcasm font. Digby then quotes from a recent Wall Street Journal report:

Florida’s agricultural and construction industries say they are experiencing a labor shortage because a new immigration law that took effect July 1 is leading migrant workers to leave the state.

The law, signed in May by Florida Gov. and GOP presidential candidate Ron DeSantis, seeks to further criminalize undocumented immigration in the state. It makes it a third-degree felony for unauthorized people to knowingly use a false identification to obtain employment. Businesses that knowingly employ unauthorized workers could have their licenses suspended, and those with 25 or more employees that repeatedly fail to use the E-Verify system to check their immigration status can face daily fines. 

Business owners and workers alike say the ranks of laborers in Florida have grown noticeably thinner.

“The employee who wants to work on the farm is not available anymore,” said Hitesh Kotecha, owner of a produce packaging facility in South Florida who leases land to farmers. “How are we going to run the farms?”

At downtown Miami’s construction sites, the story is the same: Workers have fled. Others are waiting to see what happens.

In Miami’s booming construction market, developers, construction companies and construction workers say the change happened as soon as DeSantis signed the legislation this spring. Workers at several construction sites in South Florida say a quarter to half of their teams are gone, exacerbating an already challenging labor shortage across the industry...

It's not just the employment:

In addition to increasing penalties on employers and workers, the new law requires hospitals that accept Medicaid to question a patient’s immigration status, and invalidates out-of-state driver’s licenses issued to people unauthorized to be in the U.S. It makes it a third-degree felony to knowingly transport into Florida a person who is undocumented and illegally entered the U.S. The law also adds $12 million to the amount of money the state has earmarked for its migrant-relocation program, bringing the total to $22 million this year. 

This is something that affects medical care, and people relocating to Florida for family/personal reasons. In the push to get at illegal immigrants who have fake IDs, we're going to see an increase in legal migrants having their IDs challenged and facing penalties for laws they're not breaking. This could even affect natural-born Latinos some of whom come from families that have been in the United States since before the goddamn siege at the Alamo. Wanna bet how quickly a Peruvian-American family at Universal Orlando or EPCOT visiting from Utah gets tossed into jail all because their dad's driver's license fails a "papers please" checkpoint on I-4?

It's a nightmare. There is no freedom here, only Republican cruelty.

And it's not just the Latinos suffering. White women are waking up to the reality that DeSantis just gutted their rights to alimony.

The way divorce works in the United States is messy, but alimony was a system that provided women coming out of a failed marriage some economic stability, based on the economic realities divorced women are more likely to fall into poverty after separation. Alimony can be a headache for the ex-husband, but it was a way to ensure women couldn't be forced by economic uncertainty to stay in a marriage that was broken (and likely violent/abusive).

What DeSantis passed ended "permanent alimony" and shifted the system to an adjustable format that uses a more complex and possibly confusing scaling system that undercuts any fiscal stability divorcing women could find. Here's some of the details (via NBCMiami news site):

Along with eliminating permanent alimony, the measure will set up a process for ex-spouses who make alimony payments to seek modifications to alimony agreements when they want to retire.

It will allow judges to reduce or terminate alimony, support or maintenance payments after considering a number of factors, such as “the age and health” of the person who makes payments; the customary retirement age of that person’s occupation; the "economic impact” a reduction in alimony would have on the recipient of the payments; and the “motivation for retirement and likelihood of returning to work” for the person making the payments.

The bill will set a five-year limit on what is known as rehabilitative alimony.

Under the plan, people married for less than three years will not be eligible for alimony payments, and those who have been married 20 years or longer will be eligible to receive payments for up to 75 percent of the term of the marriage.

The new law will also allow alimony payers to seek modifications if “a supportive relationship exists or has existed” involving their ex-spouses in the previous year. Critics argued the provision is vague and could apply to temporary roommates who help alimony recipients cover living expenses for short periods of time...

Everything I'm seeing so far becomes either a greater risk that women will lose alimony they were promised, to where they won't get any alimony at all.

For lower-income women, this merely ensures they will have no safety net should they try to escape a bad (violent) marriage. For upper-income women, this is going to ensure they are sliding down into lower-income status while their rich ex-husbands stay rich.

This is not going to bode well for women in Florida, who are already coping with the harsh anti-abortion laws DeSantis and the Florida GOP dumped on them. And it ought to horrify all the women across the United States where DeSantis is threatening to make America just like the hellhole he's making right now.

If there's any joy to be had, it's that for all of DeSantis' pandering on Far Right issues - to stake an early primary lead against donald trump - he has failed miserably. Everything DeSantis does in Florida isn't impressing the MAGA base voters that he needs to secure a primary win by June 2024. The way things are going, DeSantis could summon a special legislative session to pass laws giving MAGA voters everything they desire - Florida criminal charges against Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, criminalization of the Democratic party, mass arrests and deportation of everyone NOT White or Male or Obscenely Rich - and he'll still be losing to trump just sitting there whining about how unfair the world is towards himself.

It'd be tasty schadenfreude except for the reality that DeSantis is actively bullying, punishing, and harming Floridians all so he could prance on stage.

The quicker DeSantis loses the primaries and the quicker the federal courts undo half the damage DeSantis' laws are inflicting on us, the better.

Four for the Fourth 2023: Opening Thoughts

Update: Again, many thanks to Tengrain as he decided to add this article to Crooks & Liars' Mike's Blog Round-Up! Do note, this is the first of four articles I blogged on the 4th, so please take the time to view the whole site and read the other three! Hope you're surviving the summer!


One of the things I've gotten into the habit of doing on the 4th of July - yay, America - is going on a blog spree of at least four different articles covering the broad array of current political and cultural issues as we all celebrate our nation's independence from the British Crown, the lack of parliamentary representation to argue for more balanced taxation, and the ambitious capitalist greed of our Founders the American character of pursuing life, liberty, and property ownership happiness.

This 4th feels sadder, awkward, less celebratory: Due to the recent Supreme Court rulings demolishing Affirmative Action - which will cripple poor minorities' ability to use education to escape poverty - and allowing religions Christianity to actively discriminate others, there is a profound fear that our American rights - those rights of pursuing life and liberty and actual happiness (although affordable home ownership would go a long way towards resolving a major housing crisis) - are getting taken away.

I don't enjoy this feeling of despair, because it counters the hope we're supposed to feel on these Independence Days that we celebrate. We're supposed to be honoring the concepts of Life - that we are here, we are alive, and we can all contribute to the betterment of our families, friends, and communities - and Liberty - that we are free to express our love, free to express our anger at injustice, free to dance, free to travel, free to visit our friends and make new ones, free to find better jobs, free to find better homes, free to do the things we enjoy within moderation and with respect to other people's freedoms - and Happiness - the joy we derive from such Life and Liberty.

On this day I would argue we should take the time to honor those we love and use our liberty to express such joys. It's more than just fireworks - and I would argue to not use firecrackers because that upsets our dogs and cats and furry families - and barbeques, it's a time of getting together to celebrate each other. This should be the True Meaning of Independence Day.

And then tomorrow we get back to the work of redirecting our nation's long arc towards justice back on the path of Life and Liberty for all of us - White and Black and Latino and Asian and Native and in-between, Man and Woman and They, Straight and Gay/Lesbian, Cis and Trans, Born American and Immigrant American, all of us who respect the laws and polite boundaries of society without fear or hate - to achieve our moments of Happiness.

God Bless the lovers and the dreamers and the drag queens and the shiny happy people who are who they are. This is your 4th of July. And for the rest of you, God help you to give up that Fear and Hate that burns inside you.

We can be the better angels of our nature, America. And we should see that every 4th every year.


Sunday, July 02, 2023

A One-Sentence Thought About the Supreme Court's 303 Creative Ruling Against Gay Rights

On this Supreme Court ruling by the six Far Right conservative Justices that okay'ed a private business' preference to not serve gay couples looking for a website design, it's become clear that the goddamn religious wingnuts running our highest court have agreed that Christianity and only Christianity has a license to be hateful, discriminatory assholes in violation of Jesus' own commandment to love each other, and did so in a way that made it clear the religious wingnuts can behave even worse towards fellow Americans using THEIR religious standing to wage war on other beliefs, other ethnics, even other Christians.

It does not help this arch-religious Roberts Court that following their ruling, more evidence emerged that the "gay couple" identified in the plaintiff's challenge weren't even gay and hadn't asked for a website, meaning this whole matter may be in violation of Article III Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution stating that the courts can only hear cases between two sides of a legal issue, also meaning these so-called Christians violated one of God's Commandments against bearing false witness against another person.

I know, that's two sentences, but more had to be said.

Christ, these assholes.

Saturday, July 01, 2023

Thoughts On Gettysburg and on American History

We are again at the first of July, the anniversary of the three-day Battle of Gettysburg.

It's been ten years - on the 150th anniversary - since I started blogging about this day, which kind of scares me how long I've been blogging in some respects the same things over and over.

I think I keep linking the same YouTube clip of Buford railing about the high ground.


I'm a little sad that some of the other clips from that movie keep dying out, either to copyright restrictions or the YouTube provider quitting. My blogger history is full of dead links anymore.

Anywho, on this day 160 years ago, the Union army held the high ground and General Lee was too stubborn, prideful, and unwell from an untreated heart attack in March of that year to pack it up and relocate his army somewhere safer like (checks map) Daytona Beach Florida. C'mon Rebs, it's summertime, get some surf in!

I shouldn't joke about the Civil War. In some respects we're still fighting that war over basic human rights for Blacks and for our society as a whole. There's this deliberate step backwards into our nation's darker eras as Republican conservatives push to whitewash history and reject the constitutional liberties their more liberal predecessors created for the United States to make us a more diverse, democratic nation.

We're at a moment in American history where we are called - each of us - to wage battle for equal rights in education and the workplace and our communities and even in our own homes.

Anyway, Twitter is dying so that particular battlefield is turning to ash, just wanted to let you know before the Confederates try to outflank everybody to Mastadon.

(psst, I'm on Spoutible at @paulwartenberg doom me at your peril)

Thursday, June 29, 2023

The Racism That SCOTUS Just Allowed

Knew this day was coming ever since Mitch McConnell stole a Supreme Court seat away from Barack Obama. One of the driving missions of the Far Right lawyers and judges of the last 30 years has been to overturn the use of Affirmative Action in college applications, and today the heavily Far Right Supreme Court pretty much nuked that system from orbit. Via Amy Howe at SCOTUSBlog: 

Writing for the majority, Chief Justice John Roberts explained that college admissions programs can consider race merely to allow an applicant to explain how their race influenced their character in a way that would have a concrete effect on the university. But a student “must be treated based on his or her experiences as an individual — not on the basis of race,” Roberts wrote. The majority effectively, though not explicitly, overruled its 2003 decision in Grutter v. Bollinger, in which the court upheld the University of Michigan Law School’s consideration of race “as one factor among many, in an effort to assemble a student body that is diverse in ways broader than race.” Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett joined the Roberts opinion.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor – a graduate of Princeton and Yale Law School who once called herself “the perfect affirmative action baby” – dissented, in an opinion that was joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson. Sotomayor emphasized that the majority’s decision had rolled “back decades of precedent and momentous progress” and “cement[ed] a superficial rule of colorblindness as a constitutional principle in an endemically segregated society.”

The reason race-based college admission practices existed in the first place was to confront the near century-long period of segregation in the American workplace, something determined by our educational backgrounds. Young people getting hired to the best jobs tend to graduate from the better-ranked universities. Having Harvard or Yale on your resume - or depending on your region, the University of Texas in that state or University of Florida in that one - opens doors that having Florida Poly or Middle Tennessee VoTech couldn't.

Even well-established Black colleges like Howard, Florida A&M, or Morehouse can't compete if someone with a Juris Doctorate from Stanford or a medical degree from Duke stepped through the door looking for a job.

It's also a question of diversity, of getting the demographics of the nation - if not the state that university was in - to reflect the communities these college students were going to join as adults. Given how the state of Mississippi is roughly 37 percent Black, would it make sense that Ole Miss or Southern Miss or Mississippi State be so segregated that the White students never meet a single Black student? That sort of segregation before the 1960s in our schools made it easier to maintain that segregation in our societies since the post-Reconstruction Era.

And yet, here comes Roberts' conservative court, declaring "race-neutral" should be in effect when deciding who gets to enter our higher education. Like as though other factors like gender, income, and family connections aren't as problematic. Hell, the worst thing in college enrollments are the Legacy applicants: Students who get in not because they're at the top of the class but because their parents or grandparents are alumni, especially the alums who donate million-dollar building projects as a quid pro quo.

When I got into the University of Florida back in 1988, I wasn't a Legacy (my mom was Auburn, and was sore disappoint none of her sons went War Eagle), nor was I disadvantaged. Affirmative Action had no discernable affect on me. I was White, yes, but I graduated in the top two percent of my high school and scored in the top five percent of the SATs that year and I had sufficient AP and dual enrollment credits to appease the registrar's office.

The thing for Affirmation Action was that it gave disadvantaged students - often poor, and in this systemic racist nation often ethnic minority - an equal opportunity that I had to apply and enroll at what was - and hopefully still is in spite of DeSantis' recent sabotage - the top university in the state, as well as one of the top universities when it came to business, education, medicine (major pharmacy program if I recall), and journalism (the reason I applied). As a result, I attended classes with several Black students, socially interacted with them on occasion - I was to my personal shame something of an introvert, which haunts me to this day - and had no negative experiences sharing the campus with them. The biggest negative experience I got was from a white graduate student who yelled at me for biking on the wrong side of the road.

With this ruling, the Supreme Court isn't exactly banning colleges from considering race when reviewing their applicants, but they can sure as hell ignore race when rejecting those disadvantaged kids in favor of more Legacy (read: White and Wealthy) students whose parents can pay into school endowment coffers more readily. 

Elie Mystal at the Nation has a more thorough and bitter debunking of the Supreme Court's moves today (paywalled):

It has been a long goodbye. The Supreme Court declared race consciousness in college admissions, also known as affirmative action, unconstitutional today. The vote was predictable, 6-3, with all the justices appointed by Republican presidents standing together to revoke the policy. The majority opinion was written by Chief Justice John Roberts himself, who ruled that affirmative action violates the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. The 14th Amendment was, of course, written explicitly to revoke the racism practiced by whites against Blacks through their slaver’s Constitution, but Roberts doesn’t care about all that. His opinion attempts to capture the 14th Amendment and redeploy it to justify a white version of “color blindness” that just so happens to lock in a status quo that benefits whites...

But the death of affirmative action was not achieved merely through the machinations of Republican lawyers. While conservatives on the Supreme Court delivered the fatal blow, the policy has long been made vulnerable by the soft bigotry of parents, whose commitment to integration and equality turns cold the moment their little cherubs fail to get into their first choice of college or university. If you want to see a white liberal drop the pretense that they care about systemic racism and injustice, just tell them that their privately tutored kid didn’t get into whatever “elite” school they were hoping for... Some of the most horribly racist claptrap folks have felt comfortable saying to my face has been said in the context of people telling me why they don’t like affirmative action, or why my credentials are somehow “unearned” because they were “given” to me by affirmative action.

That last bit is in some ways the most devastating: Black people are attacked and shamed simply because the policy exists, regardless of whether it benefited them or not. I’ve had white folks whom I could standardize-test into a goddamn coma tell me that I got into school only because of affirmative action. I once talked to a white guy—whose parents’ name was on one of the buildings on campus—who asked me how it felt to know I got “extra help” to get in. The sheer nerve of white folks is sometimes jaw-dropping...

The actual cases decided today involve lawsuits brought by Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA), a group of AAPI (Asian American/Pacific Islander) students organized by white conservative legal gadfly Ed Blum. Blum has made it his life’s work to destroy affirmative action, and in this case, he found plaintiffs eager to argue that affirmative action policies discriminate against AAPI students who don’t get into elite schools despite competitive grades and standardized test scores.

On the facts, Blum and SFFA are simply wrong. The district court (the finder of fact in our federal system) found that the universities do not intentionally discriminate against AAPI students—and, more specifically, that there is no evidence that affirmative action is hurting them. (I have written that I think Harvard does discriminate against AAPI applicants, but that discrimination has nothing to do with affirmative action.) What this means is the entire argument against affirmative action is based on the feelings of some students (and their parents) that they would have gotten into these schools if the schools admitted fewer Black people, but that too is a thin argument. Getting rid of affirmative action will neither require schools to admit more AAPI students nor force them to weigh so-called “merit-based” factors more heavily. In California, which ended its affirmative action policies over 25 years ago, the studies show that, without affirmative action, Black enrollment plummets, Latino enrollment plummets, AAPI enrollment goes up a little bit, and whites flood the remaining opportunities...

Policies like affirmative action, as I mentioned above, were first enacted in this country during Reconstruction. Any good-faith “originalist” argument would have to acknowledge that the authors of the 14th Amendment contemplated the use of affirmative action, and we know that because affirmative action was used in their own lifetimes, after the ratification of the amendment.

But the conservatives did not adopt originalism for its good-faith arguments. They’re not ending affirmative action to help Asian American students get into Harvard or UNC. The conservative majority is ending affirmative action because college admissions are maybe the only place in American life where being white isn’t an automatic benefit to the possessor of precious white skin...

To wit, historically, the primary beneficiaries of affirmative action have been white women. Women held only 35 percent of bachelor degrees before affirmative action policies were reintroduced; now, women’s enrollment in college outpaces men, and has for some time. Now, elite colleges and universities are giving men a boost in admissions considerations, because their grades and scores are not keeping pace with women’s.

Yet you’ll note that the Supreme Court did not ban gender consciousness in college admissions. Nor did it ban legacy consciousness, wealth consciousness, geographic consciousness, or athletic consciousness. Race, and only race, is the thing the conservatives don’t want colleges and universities to look at. Because race is the card white people use that never gets declined. It is their most powerful characteristic, the one through which all else is possible.

Even with what Mystal says, the response to today's end of Affirmative Action won't make it easier for White kids to enroll in the colleges of their choice. It's going to make it easier for mediocre RICH White kids who didn't earn the privilege to enroll in the top universities and force everyone else - even poor Whites with great grades - into lesser-valued schools.

The elitism is going to get worse.

Fuck Harvard and Yale. Fuck the Ivies. Fuck my alma mater UF if they dare decide to segregate again.

Start hiring more college grads from the universities that still push for student diversity in spite of the conservative outrage against them.

There has to be other ways to ensure diversity and merit in our educational system, if only to work towards ensuring that diversity and merit in our whole society. Access to higher education is one of the few equalizers we have in American society to undo the damage of centuries of racism, and this Supreme Court just took that away. There is nothing neutral or color-blind in the United States, conservative judges, stop pretending there is.

Monday, June 26, 2023

Who Run Trumptown?

Over at the Washington Monthly, David Atkins has kind of figured out the same thing I figured out back in 2015: The modern Republican Party is terrified of and yet still panders to the rage and racism of their Far Right voting base.

Trump is not just a danger to the country and an embarrassment to his party. He is also a proven electoral liability, having weighed down Republican fortunes in the last three election cycles. And yet, his legal problems have only elevated his positioning in the fight for the Republican presidential nomination against Florida Governor Ron DeSantis and the rest of the field. Even though the party leaders know Trump is a liability, they remain silent or vocally defend him.  

A normal, rational political party would jettison Trump and find a more reputable champion for its policies. But today’s Republican Party is not normal. It has seemingly abandoned basic political reasoning and lost its self-preservation instincts. Conventional wisdom in political science says the party decides who its nominees will be. But who makes the decisions in today’s GOP?

One answer is that Trump is in charge, singlehandedly bending the party to his will and putting his self-interest ahead of the party’s. But this explanation fails to explain why most influential conservatives and Republican leaders don’t try to change this dynamic.  

More importantly, it misreads Trump himself. The man has bigotries, manias, and obsessions and has done much to imprint them onto the Republican Party. But he is more a sheep than a shepherd. His fervently held opinions reflect what he last saw on TV or social media. He usually agrees with whomever he spoke to most recently...

It's not so much that donald trump is in control of the GOP: It's that the only type of leadership the GOP voting base will respond to are those who will pander and instigate the same ways trump does. Watch how DeSantis is doing his damnedest to punish immigrants and attack liberals over "Woke" issues. He's doing the best trump impersonation he can, if not to usurp trump's position but to fill the void when trump eventually falls. 

His criminal indictments may eventually doom trump, but the specter of trumpism is now embedded into the Republicans' collective psyche until the party itself crashes and burns. In short: For the Republicans it's now trumps all the way down.

Feeding into that doom is a Far Right media industry that profits immensely from their constant fearmongering to keep the MAGA voters entranced and enraged. But that very pandering makes that media terrified of losing their audiences, which drives them into self-inflicted damage like the Dominion defamation lawsuit:

Fox News and other conservative media outlets are often credited with being the real leaders. There is something to this: Republican politicians are far more afraid of Fox News personalities than vice versa.  

However, one interesting result of the Dominion Voting Systems lawsuit was the revelation that Fox News is terrified of its own viewers. Fox News executives feared that if they failed to toe the line on Trump’s lies about the election and many other issues, their viewers would abandon them for competing far-right TV networks Newsmax and One America News Network...

It doesn't help that Newsmax is facing their own lawsuits on the matter and could well be forced to stop pandering to their viewers... but that would kill off their audience and their profits. They're now stuck in that Catch-22 as well.

Nor are the billionaire GOP donors really in charge. The famed Koch network pulled its support from Trump long ago and has launched a so far unsuccessful campaign to defeat him because they believe he cannot win a general election. Newly empowered MAGA politicians like Marjorie Taylor Greene and Matt Gaetz are not darlings of the donor class, who prefer less overtly divisive candidates who will cut taxes for the wealthy without disrupting global trade.

The deep-pocket donors are stuck because they have nowhere to go to deny or delay a Democratic Party that would likely end their tax cut cash grabs and regulate their capital gains to - gasp - help the poor. They could afford to start a third party, but they don't have enough gullible candidates to put on the ballots to replace the existing Republican Party, and any splitting of the ballots could either give the Dems more legislative control or worse let trump back in the White House where his misrule would lead to global economic chaos.

As Atkins concludes, the Republican Party leadership created a monster in their lab: An unthinking, ill-informed voter base driven by decades of Culture War insanity to act with malice towards "the Dread Other" to where they can't dial it back. All that fear and hate the Far Right media - pushed by GOP officials to win elections for offices they can't govern - sold in the public forum were like drugs, addicting that voter base. And like any addict, the Far Right voters need stronger and bigger doses to feel the same highs.

It is difficult to escape the conclusion that the GOP base is in control of the party. Trump succeeds because he appears to be one of them. He vents their rage, watches the same television, shares the same vitriolic personality, and wears the same hatreds. He is less their leader than their reflection. Fox News is expert not at manipulating the base—though its editorial choices do certainly accomplish that to some extent—but at stoking its outrage. Big donors don’t so much generate the passions around which the base revolves as they help provide the financial fuel to turn those passions into electoral victories and legislative action...

It's all one big circle jerk: The billionaire donors keep feeding in the money to the wingnut media who gives trump every outlet to spew outrage and keep the audiences fired up as raging hate machines. It's just the group behind the wheel of this clown car are now the MAGA voter hate addicts. Everyone else in the GOP are hanging on in the back seats for dear life.

The problem is that in our skewed two-party electoral system of Winner-Take-All and partisan epistemic bubbles, we face the dangerous reality that the MAGA voter hate addicts can end up driving the national bus, and drive us all over the cliff.

For the love of GOD, to everyone else NOT in the MAGA bubble, please stop voting Republican. It's the only honest way to end their cycle of self-immolation and even help them recover to some semblance of Eisenhower normalcy.

Saturday, June 24, 2023

Russia Rushing Toward Collapse (w/ Update)

Holy shit things are moving fast. 

Last night, the head of the mercenary Wagner group turned against the Russian military they were working with in Ukraine, seizing a key command HQ and twisting the knife into Putin's corrupt rule. The early hours of the turning created a lot of chaos, as Adam L Silverman the Intel expert at Balloon Juice tried to make sense of the early reports, conflicting stories, possible staged grievances, and other picture postcards:

As  I write this Prigozhin, supposedly leading Wagner, has announced that he’s moving on Moscow to deal with Minister of Defense Shoigu and the senior military staff/leadership who have failed Russia, the Russian people, and Vladimir Putin with both how they’ve prosecuted the reinvasion of Ukraine and how they’ve misled Putin. Not a coup, just a long overdue violent annual performance eval. In response the Fortress Plan – the security crisis action plan for municipal defense – has been activated for Rostov on Don and for Moscow. And the FSB, the Russian successor to the Soviet KGB, has either opened a criminal case or actually charged Prigozhin for violating the laws regarding not disparaging the military during the Special Military Operation and/or calling for armed rebellion. I’ve also seen reports that the St. Petersburg Police and/or Russian Special Forces have raided Wagner’s St. Petersburg offices.

Silverman adds among the Twitter feeds he's relying on for commentary that:

Other than videos and some audio released on social media THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO EVIDENCE THAT THE RUSSIAN MOD BOMBARDED A WAGNER REAR BASE OR THAT WAGNER, LED BY PRIGOZHIN IS MOVING OUT OF THE DONBAS, THROUGH RUSSIA, AND TOWARDS MOSCOW!!!!!

(This is presented in the BOLD CAPS LOCK mode that he's working with)

In Silverman's opinion, if Prigozhin was triggered by something it wasn't any kind of attack. Personally, my money is on the likelihood that the Russian military wanted to take direct control of the Wagner units to counter-attack Ukraine's counter-attack currently underway, and Prigozhin didn't want to deal with their sorry asses anymore (Update: I was kind of right. Prigozhin was refusing to sign contracts with the Ministry of Defense that would have taken away his control over his private army).

Silverman then spools together a Twitter thread by Tatiana Stanovaya, Senior Fellow at the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center, which I'll copy here:

Here are a few insights into the situation surrounding Prigozhin:

1️⃣ For a long time, Prigozhin has been out of direct contact with Putin, yet he’s believed he was acting in Putin’s interests “by default”. His significant contributions in the war enhanced his sense of exclusivity and privilege.

2️⃣ The President’s administration maintained the stance that unless explicitly directed, it wasn’t feasible to openly confront Prigozhin, despite a strong inclination to do so. In fact, they had even convinced themselves of his usefulness.

3️⃣ As I’ve previously stated, the atrocities of war can drive people to the brink of sanity. Even the most loyal players, who are dependent on the Kremlin (which doesn’t imply complete manageability), can lose their sense of proportion. This is especially true when there appears to be no response to the continual attempts to escalate the situation.

4️⃣ Now that the state has actively engaged, there’s no turning back. The termination of Prigozhin and Wagner is imminent. The only possibility now is absolute obliteration, with the degree of resistance from the Wagner group being the only variable. Surovikin was dispatched to convince them to surrender. Confrontation seems totally futile.

5️⃣ The impending end of Wagner has satisfied many in power. He had become excessively anti-state, which is intolerable during a war. However, a significant number of those outside of power now lament the loss of a character like Prigozhin, who had begun to appeal due to his daring and audacity. Consequently, political repercussions are expected.

A crucial point to note is that many within the elite will now personally fault Putin for letting the situation escalate to such extremes and for his lack of a timely, adequate response when to many it was evident that Prigozhin was pushing the limits of Kremlin’s tolerance. Therefore, this entire saga is also an undercut to Putin’s standing...

Even if Putin puts down Prigozhin's betrayal/coup attempt, this weakens Putin's own standing. He'll also be eliminating one of the few effective fighting forces he has in Ukraine, as the Wagner mercs will either flee or refuse to fight under the command of Russian generals they know are corrupt and inept.

The flip-side of that - as I was waking up to this morning as Prigozhin's attempt is still ongoing - is if Wagner succeeds in overthrowing the Russian military command or even Putin himself, utter chaos reigns. A demoralized army - already broken by a meat-grinder war in Ukraine - will have no idea who's truly in charge. Unless Prigozhin is primed and able to assume full command - and show any tactical and strategical skill needed to maneuver a large-scale military offensive - he's simply going to take over a bad job and make it worse for Russia.

The political implications of this coup are enormous. As long as Putin is in charge of anything, Prigozhin won't be able to dictate terms to the government (the "legislature" and "courts" however legitimate they are). There's also the reality of the oligarchs allied to Putin, and determining which way they'll jump (which will always be to favor their own pockets).

When I woke this morning, this was the current reporting from the international newswire Reuters: TANKS - okay, maybe just one so far - ARE ROLLING ONTO MOSCOW.

ROSTOV-ON-DON/VORONEZH, Russia, June 24 (Reuters) - Russian military helicopters opened fire on Saturday afternoon on a convoy of rebel mercenaries already more than half way towards Moscow in a lightning advance after seizing a southern city overnight.

President Vladimir Putin vowed to crush an armed mutiny he compared to Russia's Civil War a century ago.

Fighters from Yevgeny Prigozhin's private Wagner militia were in control of Rostov-on-Don, a city of more than a million people close to the border with Ukraine, and were rapidly advancing northwards through western Russia...

Prigozhin, whose private army fought the bloodiest battles in Ukraine even as he feuded for months with the top brass, said he had captured the headquarters of Russia's Southern Military District in Rostov after leading his forces into Russia from Ukraine.

In Rostov, which serves as the main rear logistical hub for Russia's entire invasion force, residents milled about, filming on mobile phones, as Wagner fighters in armoured vehicles and battle tanks took up positions.

One tank was wedged between stucco buildings with posters advertising the circus. Another had "Siberia" daubed in red paint across the front, a clear statement of intent to sweep across the breadth of Russia.

In Moscow, there was an increased security presence on the streets. Red Square was blocked off by metal barriers.

"Excessive ambitions and vested interests have led to treason," Putin said in a televised address, comparing the insurrection at a time of war abroad to Russia's revolution and civil war unleashed during World War One.

"All those who deliberately stepped on the path of betrayal, who prepared an armed insurrection, who took the path of blackmail and terrorist methods, will suffer inevitable punishment, will answer both to the law and to our people."

Putin's saying this while on Twitter - instant news whether you want it or not - the observers are chortling "Moscow in 3" (either hours or days, they haven't agreed on which) as an ironic echo to Putin's 2022 decree of taking Kyiv in 3 days.


This is all still chaos. Meanwhile in Ukraine, the fighting hasn't stopped. Russian troops are still holding their defensive positions in the Donbas and southeastern half of that country. Unless Putin decides he needs his troops back in Russia to stay in power, or if Prigozhin takes control and orders them back to consolidate himself, this war isn't going to be over anytime soon.

But if Putin does indeed fall from power, this seriously changes everything. He has tied himself into so many elements of Russia - the political corruption and the economic corruption and the religious corruption and the cultural corruption - that there is no idea what could rise up to fill that void.

Putin's dream of empire is still a nightmare for the rest of us, even as it crashes down around him.

Update: Not more than six hours after I blogged this, there's a tentative peace deal between Putin and Prigozhin. Via Reuters:

Heavily armed Russian mercenaries who advanced most of the way to Moscow began turning back on Saturday, de-escalating a major challenge to President Vladimir Putin's grip on power, in a move their leader said would avoid bloodshed.

Yevgeny Prigozhin, a former Putin ally and founder of the Wagner army, said his men reached within 125 miles (200 km) of the capital. Earlier, Moscow deployed soldiers in preparation for their arrival and told residents to avoid going out.

The Wagner fighters captured the city of Rostov hundreds of miles to the south before racing in convoy through the country, transporting tanks and armoured trucks and smashing through barricades set up to stop them, video showed...

The office of Alexander Lukashenko said the decision to halt further movement of Wagner fighters was brokered by the Belarusian president, with Putin's approval, in return for guarantees for their safety.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Prigozhin himself will move to Belarus under the deal. Peskov said Lukashenko had offered to mediate because he had known the mercenary leader personally for around 20 years...

To have Putin's puppet regime in Belarus broker this deal is merely one part of the overall humiliation brought to Putin's table. Throughout this crisis, Russia's own military failed to respond in full against a "turncoat" private army, highlighting the low morale and poor discipline plaguing the regular forces. Prigozhin made faster advancements marching into Russia within 24 hours where it took him and his Wagner brigades over three months to achieve anything at Bakhmut.

Despite all the assurances between the two sides ("We ARE struggling together!"), how can there be any trust now between Prigozhin and Putin? Prigo's gonna have to watch every drink handed to him and sleep with one eye open and avoid tall buildings for however long Putin's on this Earth. Putin is going to have to deal with the consequences of a failing military that may still mutiny themselves if he cracks down too harshly on them for this failure, and worry that Prigozhin's popularity with a Russian population that worships basic competence can still undermine him.

It should be noted that making any kind of deal like this is a mug's game. A deal with a Russian is no deal at all. The question is, which Russian is going to break it first?

Monday, June 19, 2023

A Simple Question (w/ Update)

(Update: Many thanks again to Batocchio for adding this article to Crooks & Liars' Mike's Blog Round-Up on 06/22/23. Please take a few minutes to peruse the other articles I've written, and please leave comments!)

To all of the Far Right, MAGA-driven Republican voters siding with donald trump on his allegations of his indictments being a "WITCH HUNT" I ask a simple question.

Do you honestly think that all of these criminal charges and indictments on trump would happen to Chris Christie if he had been your 2016 Presidential candidate and had upset Hillary in the Electoral College?

I use Christie as a "what if" example as the then-governor of New Jersey was neck-deep in the Bridgegate scandal that had erupted over the partisan closing of an interstate highway bridge. Allegations about misuse of federal relief aid after Hurricane Sandy were still rampant. A lot of questionable criminal allegations surrounded Christie more than 8 years ago.

The result in real life was that Christie avoided a courtroom. The federal and state investigations couldn't prove enough against him on many of those allegations and he skated. The Supreme Court overturned the convictions of two of his staffers who were involved in the bridge closing. One thing about a career politician like him is that he knows how to create plausible deniability between himself and his handlers. If he had been President, it certainly would have put a hold on the investigations (bloody OLC memo, mutter grumble).

But would a former President Christie be facing a "witch hunt" today by vengeful Democratic/liberal leadership of the Biden administration? There could have been a few unanswered questions after 2021 that Biden's people could have reopened to make Christie's life a living hell. And yet, no it did not happen.

Has there been a history - I'm thinking back to LBJ, who could be that petty - of previous Democratic Presidencies that turned the Justice Department into the Vengeance Department, anything that would suggest something like that happening now towards trump or any other Far Right figure? There were and still are a number of partisan Republican annoyances who could be jailed just for being so, but yet you don't see that happening (yet. To be honest: the January 6 Grand Jury may drop that hammer soon). For the love of GOD, Matt Gaetz is still a free man because the FBI and DOJ were not able to find enough evidence and credible eyewitness testimony - Gaetz's cohort Greenberg was compromised, and the teen girl Gaetz abused refused to testify - to bring him to court. 

Also, there's no evidence that Christie would have risen to the level of criminal behavior - especially with the theft of classified documents and obstructive attempts to keep them - that trump has. Character still matters in the formation of Presidential behavior, and while Christie can be a bully there's no evidence he is as narcissistic as trump to where Christie would have crossed the lines trump has.

You could also ask if there's been a history of previous Republican Presidencies that tried to make the Justice Department the Vengeance Department, but for what I've learned the closest was Nixon's administration going after Anti-War protestors like the Chicago Eight

You can ask that simple question at the beginning of this article not only using Christie but of every other credible 2016 primaries choice for the GOP: Would Jeb Bush have done the things trump has? Would Marco Rubio? Would Scott Walker? Would John Kasich? Hell, would Ted Cruz be as stupid and crooked as trump when it comes to violating the federal laws - stealing classified documents, obstructing investigations, inciting insurrection and violence towards Congress - trump is alleged doing?

Let us be honest here: If the Republican voting base had not gone for donald trump, if they had agreed that their standard bearer could have been any of the other 2016 candidates, the Republican nominee would have been someone better versed and more savvy about the political and legal systems. That person would have had a (slightly) stronger Character. That candidate (and President) would have avoided the traps trump happily jumped into. And there would be nothing today for the federal justice system - which isn't liberal by nature, but has to uphold laws in as consistent a manner as possible - to pursue for indictments, either legitimately or for "witch hunts".

No. Everything that is happening to trump - every criminal charge getting laid at his feet - is tied directly to trump's nature as a con artist grifter obsessed with money, power, and leverage (or as his Russian buddies call it Kompromat). It has nothing to do with trump being conservative, or Republican, or Christian, or "great". It has everything to do with trump being a crook his entire adult life.

trump is calling it all "WITCH HUNT" not only because he's desperate to avoid criminal conviction, he is also convinced that the legal system is meant to inflict witch hunts and punishments on political opponents in the first place. You can look to how he pushed for dubious "investigations" into Hillary's 2016 campaign for "illegally spying on him" all of which ended up as John Durham's Special Counsel inquiries... which all ended with no proof of trump's allegations and acquittals on the two cases Durham brought to trial.

Durham's failures should in truth prove that the American legal system - from the federal courts to the Justice Department to the FBI to even the state police and courts - tries its best to avoid political attacks in spite of trump's accusations (and hopes, should he return to power). The legal system is not based on Narrative - the opinions and unproven fears of the partisan hacks - but on Fact - the evidence gathered, the testimony of witnesses, the relevant matters - and on the Facts trump is either lying to the public or he's lying to himself. It can be both.

Again, this is the simple question: If it had been anyone else in the White House other than trump, would we be honestly seeing criminal indictments on the things trump has done (and hilariously enough, things he's openly bragging about)?

Here is the simple answer: No. This is all on trump.

The horrifying thing is how the rest of the Republican Party now wants to behave like trump.

This is not going to get better anytime soon. 

And yet, let justice be done.

Update: Later today I saw reports from the Washington Post that the FBI and key Justice Department figures fought against any kind of investigation into trump's misconduct in the Presidency. This partly fits my argument that the federal law enforcement agencies are not "witch hunting" as trump proclaims, but this does point to a troubling unwillingness by the FBI and DOJ to hold ANY high-level figure accountable (as long as that figure isn't Hillary). That it took the DOJ almost a full year to open investigations into trump's involvement in the January 6th riot, and that the department dragged out the efforts by the National Archives to recover the stolen classified documents, signals how slow this move towards justice truly is.

There's a ticking clock here, America, and if trump delays any justice until Election Day 2024, we may well be screwed forever.

Speed it up, Garland. Let justice truly be done.