As though building a massive 1,500-mile-long border wall between the U.S. and Mexico will stop immigrants from even trying to enter. Like previous walls were ever effective? Ask the Chinese how effective the Great Wall (12,000 MILES!) was stopping the Mongol hordes (answer: not that well). Ask the French if that Maginot Line ever worked out (nope). Ask the Soviets if that Berlin Wall was good for anything other than incredible graffiti art on the Western side of it.
Build a 50-foot-tall wall and you're pretty much creating a market for 51-foot ladders (two-packs, one for each side to climb up and climb down). That and a burgeoning tunnel industry.
And now, in order to match the "Trump's Wall" insanity of the 2015 round of GOP primaries, Scott Walker - desperate to fix falling numbers and regain a top spot in the polls - is pushing the nativist agenda to another conclusion: that we need to enforce the U.S. border with CANADA to stop the dreaded Canuck threat from the north, eh?
...Republicans typically take a tough approach on securing the southern border, but few have said a wall should also be built along the U.S.-Canada border.Well, the Canada-United States border is the longest international border between two nations in the world at 5,500 miles long give or take a few meters in that evil metric system. It's also one of the least-defended, as the United States and Canada have not been at war with each other since the 1870s. I think.
Walker reasoned that it's about much more than building a wall, arguing, "It starts with securing the homeland."
"It wasn't just about building a wall and securing our borders," he said. "It was also about making sure our intelligence community has the ability for counterterrorism and the ability to go after the infrastructure they need to protect us."
Granted, Michael Moore - that librul! - has covered this idea before. We've been inundated with Canadians for generations, with them taking our acting and singing jobs from us (damn us, KIRK IS CANADIAN!) at an alarming rate...
Still, when you consider what it is Walker is actually asking out of us, he's asking for Americans to build a massive ice wall designed to protect us from that most insidious threat from the North:
White Walkers.
Walker vs. Walkers. Who would win?
To be honest, I doubt the Republican Party would carry through on ANY wall-building project for one simple reason.
Such a project would represent a massive government jobs program. Even if they sub-contract it out to vendor corporations, such massive construction jobs thousands of miles long and with additional fortifications and barracks for security staff would cost into the hundreds of billions of dollars (just for Trump's Wall to the South). Given that the Canadian border is three times longer... Both walls would be a huge expense. And while the Republicans are eager to waste billions on war, any project of this size would bring up the unavoidable question of who (taxes) would pay (taxes on the middle class and poor) for it (not the rich who will always get their tax cuts).
1 comment:
There are more "Walker vs. Walkers" match-ups than Scott Walker against the White Walkers. Given the interest I have in the zombie apocalypse at my blog, the first image that comes to my mind are those of The Walking Dead. It turns out there are lots of "zombie Scott Walker" memes out there. There's also a "Scott Walker vs. Scout Walker" meme for the Star Wars fans out there.
Taking another angle on this issue, the idea of a fortified border with Canada reminds me of a Pinky and the Brain episode, "Brain of the Future," in which the U.S. confronted a Canada led by a dictator with a Napoleon complex, which I thought was pretty ludicrous at the time. Unfortunately, I can't find an image of him. I guess I'll have to make a screen capture myself.
Finally, Andy Borowitz has one of his usual funny takes on the idea, "Nation with Crumbling Bridges and Roads Excited to Build Giant Wall." That fits right in with your last point.
Post a Comment